Does the study say what the headline says, is the supplement worth it, is the myth actually a myth, should the school teach it that way. Claims, studies and hunches, weighed by curious people who read the source.

Jurors are the readers who check the footnotes: students, teachers, nurses, engineers and the hobbyist with a telescope. They judge the evidence you bring.

How cases are written here: first person, the claim, where you read it and what the counter-claim is. Name the sides by the claim ("The study holds up" / "The headline oversold it"), never "scientific" against "ignorant".